CreationswapCreationswap

The design looks phenomenal, but I think the clarity could use some work, not sure if that's up for discussion... but here are my thoughts on the actual presentation / construction of the questions:

Under "Basics" 

• Do they need to be open-ended? (i.e. would it be better to have age ranges and "circle one" instead of "How old are you?"
• You might add a frequency of attendance... weekly, bi-weekly, once a month, less...

Under "Ministry Experience"

• I love the layout, but is it too much work / confusing?
• I think most people would get that for the two questions, the numbers for the rating relate to their list, but that might not be readily apparent.
• Is there a way to combine the response and the rating of each?
• What does the number scale represent?
• Is 1 or 10 better? 
• If I love the worship and sermon, but the service is too long, how should that be quantified?
• What if the questions were open-ended here (along with combined as above)? Like: "What ministry are you involved in? What is going really well / something that ministry does well? What is something that could be better?" (That's three questions... but that might get you more of the answers you're looking for)

Under "Outreach"

• What qualifiers are you using for determining "effectiveness" in outreach?
• Great outreach could be converting people each week to one person, and feeding the homeless to another.
• It asks how well you are "reaching people" in the church, community, and the world; but what would that mean?